Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics in patients with high RVP, low RVP, and intermediate RVP

From: Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction

Patient characteristics

Group A; 100% RV pacing (n = 16)

Group B; ≤ 1% RV pacing (n = 29)

Group C; > 1–< 100% RV pacing (n = 60)

p value

Age (years)

75 ± 3.5

68 ± 1.8

80 ± 1.2

< 0.0001

Gender (female)

50%

72%

42%

0.02

Hypertension

81%

72%

90%

ns

Diabetes mellitus

25%

17%

27%

ns

Coronary artery disease

44%

41%

53%

ns

Trans-aortic valve replacement

25%

3%

12%

ns

Cardiac bypass/valve surgery

31%

17%

23%

ns

Baseline LVEF%

60 ± 1.4

62 ± 1.3

57 ± 1

0.005

Beta-blocker use

19%

38%

50%

ns

Calcium channel blocker use

6%

7%

7%

ns

Antiarrhythmic medication use

0%

7%

18%

ns

De novo pacemaker implant

56%

48%

48%

ns

Indication for pacemaker

94% (AVB)

7% (AVB)

53% (AVB)

< 0.0001

6% (SSS)

93% (SSS)

47% (SSS)

Duration of analysis (days)

1029 ± 67

1076 ± 38

1033 ± 32

ns

Pacemaker company

50% (MDT) 50% (BS)

69% (MDT) 31% (BS)

65% (MDT) 35% (BS)

ns

Programmed mode of pacing

100% (DDD)

31% (DDD)

62% (DDD)

< 0.0001

0% (MVP)

69% (MVP)

23% (MVP)

0% (VVI and DDI)

0% (VVI and DDI)

15% (VVI and DDI)

Minimum pacing rate (n/min)

61 ± 1

59 ± 1

60 ± 0.5

ns

Maximum tracking rate (n/min)

127 ± 2.4

128.4 ± 1.2

126 ± 1.2

ns

Rate response present

50%

76%

70%

ns

  1. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; AVB, atrioventricular block; SSS, sick sinus syndrome; MDT, Medtronic; BS, Boston scientific; DDD, dual paced, dual sensed, dual inhibited/triggered; MVP, managed ventricular pacing; RV, right ventricular; ns, not significant. ANOVA for continuous variables; chi-square test for categorical variables