Is CRT-D superior to CRT-P in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?

Table 1 Demographic data of the included studies

Study name	Study type	CRT-D group	CRT-P group	Mean age (years)		Male (%)		Follow-up (months)	Mean EF (%)
Study name	Study type	CRT-D group	CRT-P group	D	P	D	P	Follow-up (months)	D	P
Morani et al. [20]	R	101	64	67	74	85	68	54	27	27
Looi et al. [7]	R	186	50	67	70	91	72	29	24	25
Kutyifa et al. [8]	R	209	458	63	66	84	71	28	28	27
Reitan et al. [9]	R	186	125	65	72	84	83	59	25	25
Witt et al. [10]	R	428	489	63	67	80	68	48	25	25
Danish [3]	RCT	322	323	64	63	73	72	67	25	25
Drozd et al. [23]	Pr	251	544	69	75	93	74	36	30	30
Barra et al. [24]	R	1943	682	65	73	84	57	41	25	27
Leyva et al. [25]	R	551	999	70	73	79	70	56	23	24
Wang et al. [26]	R	93	42	80	81			46	24	28
Saba et al. [1]	R	4359	1236	72	77	64	60	60
Liang et al. [27]	R	219	126	59	62	75	64	100	30	31
Gras et al. (> 75) [18]	R	1481	1481			73	74	72
Gras et al. [18] (< 75)	R	2275	2275			73	74	72
COMPANION [4]	RCT	270	285	63	63	51	51	17	20	20
Vares et al. [28]	R	293	417	67	70	81	67	43	28	30

CRT-D cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillation, CRT-P cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacing, D defibrillation group, P pacing group, Pr prospective, R retrospective, RCT randomized controlled trial

ISSN: 2466-1171