Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | International Journal of Arrhythmia

Fig. 1

From: Reactive atrial-based anti-tachycardia pacing algorithm in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices is safe and feasible without increase in thromboembolic events in patients with a left atrial appendage closure device

Fig. 1

A bar-graph depicting mean ± SEM AF burden (% of total time spent in AF) over 1-year timeframe, at baseline before the Watchman® implant and yearly thereafter over the next 3 years divided into rhythm-control (panel A) and rate-control (panel B) subgroups. Baseline AF burden pre-implant was not significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 0.2). However, note that the AF burden does not significantly increase in the rhythm-control group (p  > 0.5) but does increase for the rate-control group (*p < 0.05 when compared to their respective baseline). SEM: standard error of mean

Back to article page

International Journal of Arrhythmia

ISSN: 2466-1171

Contact us